Dear fellow American,

Did you know that Barack Obama has already banned nearly a million American made rifles?

Nearly a million rifles.

Banned by Barack Obama and his anti-gun cronies.

In a bureaucratic block the Obama Administration secretly blocked the re-importation of American made M-1 Garand and Carbine rifles being stored in South Korea.

These rifles were used by the US military during the Korean War and left there after the war was over.

With one stroke of his pen, Barack Obama bypassed the Constitution and single-handedly banned nearly a million American made rifles by executive fiat.

In response, I instructed my staff to prepare a petition for you to sign to voice opposition Obama’s Historic Rifle Ban.

Please click here to watch the video they created in which NAGR Director of Operations Luke O’Dell discusses this latest gun ban with M-1 Garand expert Rory Edwards.

Make no mistake, these rifles were made in America, by Americans for Americans to defend freedom on foreign shores and are greatly sought after by American shooters and collectors.

Now State Department officials claim these antique, collector rifles could be used to commit crimes.

While the radical anti-gun crowd is giddy with praise for Obama’s latest back-door gun ban, law-abiding citizens across the United States are crying foul.

These outrageous claims are a thinly veiled attempt to distract from Obama’s special interest payback to the radical anti-gun crowd.  This desperate pandering must not be allowed to continue.

That’s why we’ve prepared a petition and video against Obama’s Historic Rifle Ban.

Click here to watch the video and sign the petition.

It has been common practice since the end of World War II to re-import these American made rifles from the foreign allies they were lent to after the war.

During the Reagan Administration a similar import request for 200,000 Garand rifles was approved.

State Department officials say they are working with South Korea to “dispose” of these American made rifles.

You and I both know that is bureaucratic code for the melting down and destruction of these iconic American made rifles.

On top of banning American citizens from owning these rifles, Obama’s State Department is arranging for the destruction of nearly one million historic, American rifles.

To help dispel some of the myths surrounding this iconic American rifle, Director of Operations Luke O’Dell interviewed M-1 Garand expert Rory Edwards.

Click the link below to view the video.


Let me be clear: at no time in U.S. history has the ownership of any part of this gun been restricted or banned.

These firearms — truly pieces of American history — rightly belong in the hands of U.S. citizens, and Obama has banned nearly one million of them without cause.

Please click here to learn more about the M-1 Garand and Barack Obama’s ban on the re-import of nearly one million American made rifles.

Once you’ve watched the video, please sign the petition against Obama’s Historic Rifle Ban.

The National Association for Gun Rights’ staff will compile your petitions and forward them to President Barack Obama and Congressional leaders Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

Also, please chip in $10 or $20 to help the National Association for Gun Rights continue to fight the Obama Historic Rifle Ban.


Thank you, in advance for joining me in standing up against this outrageous anti-gun action.

For liberty,

Dudley Brown
Executive Director
National Association for Gun Rights

P.S. In a bureaucratic block, President Barack Obama has blocked the re-import of nearly a million American made rifles.

That’s nearly a million historic rifles that Obama doesn’t want in the hands of American citizens like you and me.

Please click here to watch a video about the M-1 Garand rifle and sign a petition against Barack Obama’s Historic Rifle Ban.

Once you’ve seen the video and signed the petition, please chip in $10 or $20 to help the National Association for Gun Rights continue to fight Obama’s Historic Rifle Ban.

Advertisements

Too good to pass up

September 28, 2010

I just had to pass on this quote from Peter Schmuck, a Baltimore sports writer, concerning the indictment of Roger Clemens.

 “Isn’t it great to live in a society where the penalty for lying to a congressman can be up to 30 years in jail, but the penalty for a congressman lying to you is another two years in office.

Opinion in Brief

“[One of the] central reasons for the Tea Party’s rise … is the yardstick. … Imagine that over at the 36-inch end you’ve got pure liberal thinking — more and larger government programs, a bigger government that costs more in the many ways that cost can be calculated. Over at the other end you’ve got conservative thinking — a government that is growing smaller and less demanding and is less expensive. You assume that when the two major parties are negotiating bills in Washington, they sort of lay down the yardstick and begin negotiations at the 18-inch line. Each party pulls in the direction it wants, and the dominant party moves the government a few inches in their direction. But if you look at the past half century or so you have to think: How come even when Republicans are in charge, even when they’re dominant, government has always gotten larger and more expensive? It’s always grown! It’s as if something inexorable in our political reality — with those who think in liberal terms dominating the establishment, the media, the academy — has always tilted the starting point in negotiations away from 18 inches, and always toward liberalism, toward the 36-inch point. Democrats on the Hill or in the White House try to pull it up to 30, Republicans try to pull it back to 25. A deal is struck at 28. Washington Republicans call it victory: ‘Hey, it coulda been 29!’ But regular conservative-minded or Republican voters see yet another loss. They could live with 18. They’d like 8. Instead it’s 28. … What they want is representatives who’ll begin the negotiations at 18 inches and tug the final bill toward 5 inches. And they believe Tea Party candidates will do that.” –columnist Peggy Noonan  Thanks to the Patriot Post!

Who shall we blame?

September 12, 2010

Subject: Fw: Facts are Facts

The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009
 — it was actually January 3rd 2007.
 
The day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives & Senate, the
start of the 110th Congress.
 
The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first
time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.
 
“For those of you who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy
that everything is “Bush’s Fault,” think about this:
 

January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:
 
At the time:
The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP growth for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%

George Bush’s Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!
 
Remember the day.

January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House

Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
 
The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the
economy?
BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
 
THANK YOU DEMOCRATS for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP growth and 4.6%
Unemployment to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6
TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac FIASCOS!
 
(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie – starting in
2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy).
 

And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac?

OBAMA
 

And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?

OBAMA& the Democratic Congress
 

So when some idiot tries to blame Bush

REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007 THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!  
 
Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas
pedal and steering wheel they were driving.
 

“It’s not that liberals aren’t smart, it’s just that so much of what they know isn’t so.” -Ronald Reagan

I can only say AMEN!

September 10, 2010

Statement on the Proposed “Cordoba House” Mosque near Ground Zero

Newt Gingrich
July 21, 2010 6pm

There should be no mosque near Ground Zero in New York so long as there are no churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia. The time for double standards that allow Islamists to behave aggressively toward us while they demand our weakness and submission is over.

The proposed “Cordoba House” overlooking the World Trade Center site – where a group of jihadists killed over 3000 Americans and destroyed  one of our most famous landmarks – is a test of the timidity, passivity and historic ignorance of American elites. For example, most of them don’t understand that “Cordoba House” is a deliberately insulting term. It refers to Cordoba, Spain – the capital of Muslim conquerors who symbolized their victory over the Christian Spaniards by transforming a church there into the world’s third-largest mosque
complex.

Today, some of the Mosque’s backers insist this term is being used to “symbolize interfaith cooperation” when, in fact, every Islamist in the world recognizes Cordoba as a symbol of Islamic conquest. It is a  sign of their contempt for Americans and their confidence in our historic ignorance that they would deliberately insult us this way.
Those Islamists and their apologists who argue for “religious  toleration” are arrogantly dishonest. They ignore the fact that more  than 100 mosques already exist in New York City. Meanwhile, there are no churches or synagogues in all of Saudi Arabia. In fact no Christian  or Jew can even enter Mecca.  And they lecture us about tolerance.

If the people behind the Cordoba House were serious about religious  toleration, they would be imploring the Saudis, as fellow Muslims, to immediately open up Mecca to all and immediately announce their  intention to allow non-Muslim houses of worship in the Kingdom. They should be asked by the news media if they would be willing to lead  such a campaign.

We have not been able to rebuild the World Trade Center in nine years.  Now we are being told a 13 story, $100 million megamosque will be  built within a year overlooking the site of the most devastating surprise attack in American history.

Finally, where is the money coming from? The people behind the Cordoba  House refuse to reveal all their funding sources.  America is experiencing an Islamist cultural-political offensive  designed to undermine and destroy our civilization. Sadly, too many of  our elites are the willing apologists for those who would destroy them
if they could.  

No mosque.
No self deception.
No surrender.
The time to take a stand is now – at this site on this issue.

If, after reading this, you agree with it, please pass it on to  others. This is the most clearly stated, sensible, and historically accurate statement that I’ve read on this issue (and I’ve read a lot of them). Why can’t we have a President as intelligent, educated,  and patriotic as this former Speaker of the House?

Yea, Right!

September 10, 2010

I believe government should be lean, it should be efficient, and it should leave people free to make the choices they think are best for themselves and their families, so long as those choices don’t hurt others. B H Obama

Our Early congress

September 7, 2010

“Wednesday, SEPTEMBER 7, 1774, 9 o’clock a.m.

Agreeable to the resolve of yesterday, the meeting was opened with prayers by the Rev. Mr. Duche’.

Voted, That the thanks of Congress be given to Mr. Duche’…for performing divine Service, and for the excellent prayer, which he composed and delivered on the occasion.”

Rev. Jacob Duche’ had prayed:

“O God of Wisdom…direct the counsel of this Honorable Assembly…that the scene of blood may be speedily closed…that Truth and Justice, Religion and Piety, prevail.”

John Adams wrote:

“Reverend Duche’…read the 35th Psalm… After this…unexpectedly to every body, struck out into an extemporary prayer, which filled the bosom of every man present.

I must confess, I never heard a better prayer.”

The Library of Congress printed on an historical placard of Carpenter’s Hall, Philadelphia:

“Washington was kneeling there with Henry, Randolph, Rutledge, Lee, and Jay, and by their side there stood, bowed in reverence the Puritan Patriots of New England…

‘It was enough’ says Mr. Adams, ‘to melt a heart of stone. I saw the tears gush into the eyes of the old, grave, Pacific Quakers of Philadelphia.'”