I have been saying for months that the current occupant of the White House might declare Martial Law and suspend the 2016 elections.  Nice to see some prominent, astute intelligent  people agree.  Sundogger

All that talk about the 2016 presidential race, Hillary Clinton’s innuendoes, Rand Paul’s ideas, Chris Christie’s suggestions – may be all for naught.
There may not even be a 2016 president election, according to one man who is a likely contender.
“I hope that that is not going to be the case. But certainly there is the potential,” said Dr. Ben Carson, who was director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital and became famous for his groundbreaking work in separating conjoined twins. He is now firmly established as a superstar among conservatives across America.
He was responding to a question from Fox News interviewer Chris Wallace, who quoted Carson’s own statement that “there might not actually be elections in 2016…”“Do you really believe that?” Wallace asked.
It is possible, said Carson, “because you have to recognize we have a rapidly increasing national debt, a very unstable financial foundation, and you have all of these things gong on, like the ISIS crisis, that could very rapidly change things that are going on in our nation unless we deal with these things in a comprehensive way and a logical way.”
He said, “There’s no telling what could happen in just a couple of years, and particularly where we’re in a situation that we have a Senate and a Senate leader who has over 300 bills sitting on his desk. He will not bring them to the floor for a vote.” He described that as thwarting the will of the people and instead of having government conform to the people, having the people conform to the “will of the government.”
As for his own candidacy, he said he’d rather be enjoying a retirement with ease. But he said. “We’re sometimes called to do things we don’t want to do because we have to do them. … If we all run for the hills … then we get what we deserve.”  REPRINTED FROM WND.COM


The AFL-CIO union has teamed up with an online voter advocacy group funded by Internet giants and left-wing billionaire George Soros in a new online voter registration drive, WND has found.

The People’s World, a news website associated with the Communist Party USA, reported last week that the “voter registration” plan is “just a click away.”

Reports the magazine: “The AFL-CIO has teamed up with TurboVote to make voting easy for you and for your friends and family. Not only can you register or update your registration, but TurboVote will help you with absentee ballots, vote-by-mail information, finding your polling place and even sending reminders by email and text so you won’t forget to vote.”

TurboVote, based in Brooklyn, New York, defines itself as “an application that makes voting easy.”

In the “What We Do” section of its website, TurboVote lays out its mission: “When you sign up (won’t you sign up?), we keep track of your elections, local and national. And if you need to get registered, update your voter registration, or request an absentee ballot, we’ll get you all the forms and information you need, when you need them.”

WND has found TurboVote is linked to Internet giants like Google. The website lists its seven funders, including Google Politics.

Another funder of TurboVote is the Democracy Fund, which was created in 2011 by eBay Founder Pierre Omidyar as an initiative of Omidyar Network. In 2014, the Democracy Fund became an independent private foundation.

TurboVote is also funded by the Sunlight Foundation, which in turn receives funds from billionaire George Soros’ Open Society.

While TurboVote currently focuses on functions to making voting easier, WND first reported that in largely unreported text, President Obama’s special commission on election reform recommended tablet computers, such as iPads, be used to cast votes.

Obama’s 10-person Presidential Commission on Election Administration released its recommendations this past January in a 99-page document available online.

Much of the media coverage of the commission’s conclusions focused on a summary of key recommendations provided by the White House.

The recommendations include the following:

Modernization of the registration process through continued expansion of online voter registration and expanded state collaboration in improving the accuracy of voter lists;
Measures to improve access to the polls through expansion of the period for voting before the traditional Election Day and through the selection of suitable, well-equipped polling place facilities, such as schools;
State-of-the-art techniques to assure efficient management of polling places;
Reforms of the standard-setting and certification process for new voting technology to address soon-to-be antiquated voting machines and to encourage innovation and the adoption of widely available off-the-shelf technologies.

A WND review of the commission’s full paper, however, finds far more extensive recommendations for electronic voting.

The document states: “Software-only products can be integrated with off-the-shelf commercial hardware components such as computers, laptops, tablets, scanners, printers, and even machine-readable code scanners and signature pad products.

“Tablet computers such as iPads are common components of these new technologies,” the document continues. “They can be integrated into the check-in, voting, and verification processes in the polling place.”

The commission called attention to new technologies that allow voters to “pre-fill” sample ballots at home that can be later scanned at the polling place.

The panel addressed concerns that such technologies can be hacked.

The commission stated: “The fact that a tablet or off-the-shelf computer can be hacked or can break down does not mean such technology is inherently less secure than existing ballot marking methods if proper precautions are taken.”

The concept of electronic voting is already being tested.

Have You Seen this on wnd.com?

September 15, 2014

Displaced Syrians will likely make up the next big wave of Muslim refugees coming to America.

Since the early 1990s, the United Nations high commissioner for refugees has selected more than 200,000 refugees from Islamic countries to be resettled in the United States. Most of them have come from Somalia and Iraq.

Syria could soon be added to the mix in the midst of that country’s brutal civil war. The Obama administration has been greasing the skids for the Syrian refugees for months, WND has learned, and the refugees will soon be dumped on American cities throughout the U.S.

In February, the State Department moved to ease the rules that protect the U.S. from accepting refugees with potential ties to terrorist organizations. The rules were seen as “too strict” by the refugee-resettlement groups that lobby Congress and the administration to continuously let in more Muslims from the war-torn Middle East.

Then on Sept. 4, a U.S. State Department spokeswoman hinted at her daily press briefing that a new wave of refugees will soon be coming from another predominantly Muslim nation – Syria.

“The United Nations high commissioner for refugees just this year started referring Syrian refugees to the United States for processing,” said Marie Harf. “Obviously, we have several thousand in the pipeline, and that number will continue to go up.”

Obama’s State Department is expected to present Congress with a list within the next two weeks that shows the total number of foreign refugees it wants to accept into the country over the next year and the countries from which they will come. The new fiscal year begins Oct. 1.

A few local newspaper reports have already surfaced, providing clues as to where some of the Syrian refugees will be delivered. The Winston-Salem Journal carried a report last week that the Triad area of North Carolina could receive some of the refugees. The first Syrian family has already arrived in Greensboro, North Carolina, and is living in a hotel there, according to the Journal.

The Cleveland Plain Dealer reported Sept. 10 that the city’s social services were preparing for “a flood of refugees” from Syria and Iraq later this year. Cleveland, Akron and Columbus, Ohio, have been hotspots in the past for Muslim refugees coming from the Middle East.

Once the refugees are relocated to an American city, they are quickly connected to an array of taxpayer-funded social services, including Medicaid, food stamps and subsidized housing. Interpreters and tutors are often provided to help bridge the language gap that refugee children will find in local public schools.

Groups like Human Rights First, World Relief Corp., the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, the Catholic and Lutheran churches all have strong presences in Washington and often do the bidding of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services, World Relief, Episcopal Migration Ministries, Church World Services and the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society push for more foreign refugees to be resettled in America, which results in more federal grants flowing into their coffers.

WND has documented in previous stories that more than 90 percent of the money used by these religious charities for resettling refugees comes from federal grants, much like government contractors operating in a lucrative resettlement business under the guise of providing “charity.”

Most of the Syrian refugees will likely be coming from Turkey, where thousands have fled across the border from Syria, but others are huddled in refugee camps in Lebanon, Jordan and Egypt.

Melanie Nezer, head of policy and advocacy at Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, one of the organizations that resettles refugees in the U.S. using federal grants, wrote an op-ed March 28 in the New York Daily News in which she called for the U.S. to accept 75,000 Syrian refugees over the next five years. That would be 15,000 a year coming to the U.S. under permanent refugee status.

“That’s a huge number,” said Ann Corcoran, a writer and researcher for Refugee Resettlement Watch, a group that monitors the U.N.’s distribution of foreign refugees throughout the United States. She said 15,000 a year would be on a par with the Iraqi refugee program, which has produced the largest, fastest-growing refugee community in the U.S. since Sept. 11, 2001.

“Most of the Syrian refugees in these refugee camps are Sunni Muslims; they’re not Christians,” said Corcoran. “The camps in places like Turkey and Jordan, you’re not going to find a ton of Christians.”

The United Nations, working with the U.S. State Department, has already shipped approximately 115,000 Iraqis to American cities since Sept. 11. Another 100,000 Somalis have been resettled in the United States since that country devolved into civil war in 1993. The Somali refugees have been described as 99.9 percent Muslim by Somali-American leaders. The Iraqi refugees have also been majority Muslim and, while the exact percentages are more difficult to track, the Iraqis coming to the States have been estimated at 62 percent Muslim.

Culture clash in American cities

Once here, Muslim families have vastly more children than the typical American family. The average Somali couple in Minnesota, for example, has six children.

These refugee families have changed the demographics of their host cities, such as Shelbyville, Tennessee, Lewiston, Maine, and Minneapolis, Minnesota, all of which have reported culture clashes between Muslims expecting everything from foot baths at public colleges to dietary concessions at public schools. A Tyson Foods meat-packing plant in Shelbyville decided in 2009 to acquiesce to a local union’s demands to drop the paid holiday of Labor Day in favor of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Fitr, a decision that Tyson later reversed in the wake of a public backlash.

And in Minneapolis, Mayor Betsy Hodges sparked controversy in April when she showed up to a meeting with the city’s increasingly powerful Muslim community wearing a hijab.

Problems have also arisen with Islamic radicals recruiting young Muslim refugees in America. WND has reported in recent weeks about FBI investigations into 25 to 30 Somali refugees leaving their homes in Minnesota to become fighters for ISIS in Syria and the al-Qaeda linked Al-Shabab in Somalia.

Pamela Geller, author of “Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance,” said it should come as no surprise that the U.N. would do everything in its power to flood the United States with as many Muslim refugees as possible.

She said the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, or OIC, which is comprised of 56 Muslim countries and the Palestinian Authority, makes up the largest voting bloc at the U.N. General Assembly.

“They’re very powerful, they’re very dangerous,” Geller said. “You can’t make this stuff up.”

Geller, Corcoran and others such as Islam scholar Bat Ye’or have long warned that there are two methods of creating Islamic supremacy in the world. One is through violent jihad, the other through al-hijra, or the Islamic doctrine of immigration.

“Basically you have those who want to take over (countries) through immigration saying to the jihadists “you guys need to stop cutting people’s heads off and be patient,’” Corcoran said. Al-hijra will accomplish the same goal over the long term in countries open to immigration, which includes the United States and most of Europe.

The United States takes in about 70,000 foreign refugees per year, more than any other country in the world. Besides the United States, Germany and Sweden have also agreed to take in Syrian refugees through the U.N. program. Germany has agreed to accept another 10,000 Syrian refugees after already absorbing 6,000, while Sweden has agreed to accept up to 17,000 over the next year.

Creeping toward Sharia?

In 2011, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hosted a two-day conference with the OIC in Washington to discuss how to implement U.N. Resolution 1618 to combat “religious intolerance” and “negative stereotyping” against Muslims in the U.S., which Geller said amounted to a version of the Muslim anti-blasphemy laws.

“It was to implement the Sharia is what it was,” she said. “It was really an anti-free speech measure.”

Then in 2013 a U.S. attorney in Tennessee, William Killian, said it is possible that some inflammatory comments about Muslims posted on social media could violate civil-rights laws. He later backed off his plan to criminalize an entire segment of speech deemed offensive to Muslims, a decision Geller notes came only after an intense public outcry.

“You know, we have real problems, they’ve disarmed the American people, misinforming them or not informing them at all,” Geller said. “There are no human rights under the Sharia for non-Muslims and so the U.N. is deeply problematic. And we do their bidding.”

State Department documents show that Iraq has produced the single largest number of refugees resettled in the United States. In fiscal year 2013 alone, 19,488 Iraqis were resettled in America, followed by Burma with 16,299, Bhutan with 9,134 and Somalia with 7,608. Only 36 Syrians were allowed into the U.S. in 2013, followed by just 63 so far in 2014.

“But again, part of this is because the U.N. High Commissioner on Refugees only began this year in mid-2014 referring refugees in large numbers to the United States,” Harf said in the Sept. 4 briefing.

The Syrian civil war now has the potential to surpass even the Iraq War in its ability to create refugees. The war has caused more than 3 million Syrians to be uprooted since 2011.

Steve Emerson, a counter-terrorism expert and author of six books on radical Islam, said the screening process for refugees is not nearly tight enough.

“They’re doing very little vetting. Several years ago it was discovered that Iraqi militants were being resettled in California,” Emerson said. “So the resettlement program that’s going on around the US, the vast majority of refugees are not involved in terrorism but certainly the vetting process is lacking. It’s not that easy to acquire the intelligence needed to deny someone refugee status if in fact the conditions that apply for asylum are met.”

Then there is the problem of the powerful refugee lobby in Washington.

“You have a pro refugee lobby in the United States that is very strong and the Obama administration has been particularly receptive to it,” Emerson said.

The U.N. has been trying to relocate 30,000 Syrians it considers most vulnerable, and the U.S. would normally accept half of those, according to witnesses who testified at a Senate hearing in January.

A State Department official, who asked not to be identified, told WND that refugees assigned to the U.S. by the United Nations are thoroughly screened by the Department of Homeland Security before they are allowed into the country.

“I would refer you to DHS on that but I can assure you it’s a very rigorous process,” the official said.

The United States admits more refugees per year than all of the other countries in the world combined, Harf said.

“I think we should make the point about refugees here, that the United States resettles more refugees than the rest of the world combined, period,” Harf said. “And I think our commitment to helping with resettlement of refugees is an important one that we take very seriously.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/u-n-to-dump-flood-of-muslim-refugees-on-u-s/#8qv63ZgZh8VDVQJe.99

Muslims are already slaughtering Christians in America. Get ready for more persecution of Christians in your own country.

In one of the recent murders almost totally ignored by mainstream media, a 19 year old Roman Catholic named Brendan Tevlin was shot to death by an African American Muslim named Ali Muhammad Brown in New Jersey.

Brendan was a Eucharistic minister in the Catholic Church and also who volunteered playing the bagpipe in funerals. The slaughter of this innocent Catholic was considered by Brown, a “just kill,” and that he was seeking vengeance for what is happening to Muslims in “Iraq, Syria, (and) Afghanistan.”

Brown was driving his jeep, and he just had texted his mother that he was coming home, when he stopped at a red light, Ali shot Brendan 8 times in his jeep. Ali then drove the jeep to an apartment complex where he stole undisclosed items from the Christian martyr.

As part of his jihad, Ali murdered 3 other Americans earlier this year. The Christian humility of Brendan is reflected in what he wrote in his college application:

If the world were to stop spinning at this very moment, could you honestly say you are satisfied with what you have accomplished in your life? I couldn’t […] Most importantly […] I haven’t made the difference that I know that I personally can make.

What’s even more sickening is how the Catholic bishops in America are not intensely informing their congregations that one of their own was murdered by a Muslim heretic in America. They are too busy appeasing homosexuals and Muslims.

When a white police officer kills a black man, people scream racism and want to start a race war before a verdict is even made, but when a black Muslim murders a white Christian, the media does not even want to cover it.

I remember telling people years ago that the African American Islamic movement will be the one doing the dirty work for the Muslims in America. Many of them converted to Islam in prison, and thus they have no problems, nor do they lack the nerves, to kill and commit other crimes against America. They already have the criminal instinct, and now they are applying it for the advancement of their heresy.

The violence done by Muslims in America will be done, to a large extent, by converts to Islam. They are already amongst us. For example a girl in Colorado converted to Islam and was supporting ISIS, as we read from one report:

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/09/muslims-already-slaughtering-christians-america-get-ready-persecution-christians-country/#ksOZ0JTiEgyQLBI5.99

Interesting, to say the least!

September 13, 2014

By Matt Patterson
(Newsweek Columnist – Opinion Writer)
from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack
Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result
of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch
craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so
devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into
thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct
the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most
Imagine a future
historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered
into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades
and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community
organizer;” a brief career as a state legislator devoid of
legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his
attention, less often did he vote “present”); and finally an
unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the
entirety of which was devoted to his presidential
He left no academic
legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a
legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling
associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who
for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor;” a real-life,
actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political
sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at
it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected
president? There is no evidence that he ever attended or
worked for any university or that he ever sat for the
Illinois bar.
We have no documentation for any of his claims. He may well be
the greatest hoax in
Not content to wait
for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the
question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no
white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken
hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant
terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But
because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the
eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against
various American injustices, even if they were ‘a bit’
extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was
given a pass – held to a lower standard because of the color
of his skin.
continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history
matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he
himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a
fighting chance to become the first black president and
thereby to lay the curse of racism to
puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama
phenomenon – affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of
course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all
affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed
primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals,
feel good about
minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on
the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for
which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for
the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which
follow. Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail;
liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation
and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that
is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a
separate standard merely because of the color of his skin –
that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t
racism, then nothing
that is what America
did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his
lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted,
Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite
undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good
enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in
Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president
despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every
step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the
next step, in spite of ample evidence to the
could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on
display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that
he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about
Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those
people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply
man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that’s
when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the
prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not
one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all
warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over
again for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches
which are almost word for word his 2008 speeches)
what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything
and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad
luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job,
campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president
so willing to advertise his own powerless-ness, so comfortable
with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out
and said no one could have done anything to get our economy
and country back on track). But really, what were we to
expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so
how do we expect him to act responsibly? In short: our
president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament
nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that,
and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of
liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone
otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval

You think the war in Iraq was costing
us too much? Read this:
We have been hammered with the
propaganda that it was the Iraq war and
the war on terror that is bankrupting us.
I hope the following 11 reasons are
forwarded over and over again until
they are read so many times that the
reader gets sick of reading them. I also
have included the URL’s for verification
of all the following facts.
$11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare
to illegal aliens each year by state governments.
$22 Billion dollars a year is spent on food
assistance programs such as food stamps,
WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.
$2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on
Medicaid for illegal aliens.
Verify at:
$12 Billion dollars a year is spent on
primary and secondary school education
for children here illegally and they
cannot speak a word of English!
$17 Billion dollars a year is spent for
education for the American-born
children of illegal aliens, known as
anchor babies.
$3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to
incarcerate illegal aliens.
Verify at:
30% percent of all Federal Prison
inmates are illegal aliens.
Verify at:
$90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on
illegal aliens for Welfare & social
services by the American taxpayers.
$200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed
American wages are caused by the illegal

In 2006, Illegal aliens sent home
$45 BILLION in remittances to their
countries of origin.
The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration:
Nearly One million sex crimes committed
by Illegal Immigrants In The United States ..
http: // http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml

The total cost is a whopping
Are we THAT Stupid?
( democratic senate now vote to change )

If this doesn’t bother you, then just
delete the message. If, on the other
hand, it does raise the hair on the back
of your neck, I hope you forward it to every
legal resident in the United States. This is nuts!!!!!!!


September 9, 2014

Thought for Today:

“A liberal paradise would be a place where everybody has guaranteed employment, free comprehensive healthcare, free education, free food, free housing, free clothing, free utilities, and only law enforcement has guns.”

“And believe it or not, such a place does, indeed, exist. It’s called prison.”